Xiaomi SU7 Fatal Crash: A Wake-Up Call for Smart Driving Technology
By Team Dailyrevs April 3, 2025
The Controversial Accident
The Xiaomi SU7, an electric car that made headlines upon its unveiling, is now at the center of a major controversy following a fatal crash in China that resulted in three deaths. The accident, which occurred on March 29, 2025, on the Dezhou-Shangrao Highway in Anhui Province, has reignited concerns about the safety and reliability of smart driving technology.
The Tragic Incident
According to Xiaomi’s official statement, the SU7 was traveling at 116 km/h in Navigation on Autopilot (NOA) mode when it approached a construction zone. The system detected obstacles, issued multiple warnings, and started to decelerate. However, the driver manually took control just seconds before crashing into a concrete barrier at 97 km/h.
Chinese media reports further alleged that the vehicle burst into flames upon impact, with speculation that the doors failed to unlock, preventing passengers from escaping. Xiaomi refuted these claims, stating that the car has mechanical emergency release handles on all four doors, allowing them to be opened even if the battery is damaged.
Accident Timeline (as per Xiaomi’s Data)
| Time | Event |
|---|---|
| 10:27:17 PM | NOA mode activated, speed: 116 km/h |
| 10:36:48 PM | "Hands-off warning" issued |
| 10:44:24 PM | "Obstacle ahead" warning activated, vehicle slows down |
| 10:44:25 PM | Driver takes manual control, applies 31% braking |
| 10:44:26-28 PM | Crash into concrete wall |
| 10:44:28 PM | Emergency response system activated |
| 10:47:15 PM | Medical services dispatched |
| 11:00 PM | Emergency responders arrive on scene |
The Bigger Picture: Are Drivers Over-Reliant on Smart Tech?
The Xiaomi SU7 crash has drawn comparisons to Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) incidents, which have faced global scrutiny. While systems like NOA require drivers to stay attentive, many overestimate their capabilities, leading to risky behavior.
Tesla has been the focus of multiple U.S. investigations regarding Autopilot-related crashes. Now, Xiaomi faces similar challenges, with regulators and consumers questioning the effectiveness of its smart driving technology.
Market Impact & Future Considerations
The crash also had financial repercussions for Xiaomi. Following the news, Xiaomi stock (HKG: 1810) fell by over 5%, reflecting investor concerns over the company's entry into the competitive EV market.
However, demand for the SU7 remains strong, with order lead times extending up to 40 weeks due to high demand.
As Xiaomi actively supports the ongoing investigation, this case serves as a stark reminder:
Smart driving is not self-driving – These technologies assist but do not replace human attention.
Emergency response systems are crucial – Xiaomi’s swift response helped in gathering essential accident data.
Regulation of smart driving tech is increasing – This incident fuels the global discussion on how semi-autonomous systems should be regulated.
Conclusion: Automakers must go beyond technology development—they must educate drivers on the role of human oversight in smart driving.
Source: SCMP